ROSE
  • ROSE
  • SEMINAR SERIES
    • SEMINAR BLOG
  • ROSE Fellowship Program
    • Resources >
      • Assesments/Surveys
      • Curriculum/Modules
      • PAPERS
  • Contact
    • PEOPLE

Did you miss a 2020 ROSE Seminar?

1/14/2021

0 Comments

 

We created a YouTube channel! You can watch or rewatch the Fall 2020 ROSE Seminars using the hyperlinks below.

September 16th, 2020  - Grant Gardner, Middle Tennessee State University
Click here for the seminar with Grant Gardner

October 20th, 2020  - Mays Imad, Pima Commmunity College
​Click here for the seminar with Mays Imad

November 18th, 2020 - Erin Dolan, University of Georgia
​Click here for the seminar with Erin Dolan

December 9th, 2020 - Julie Stanton, University of Georgia

Click here for the seminar with Julie Stanton 

0 Comments

The answer to "how to do school"? Contract Grading

2/19/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Have you ever gotten back a grade in college and been confused, because you put in more work than your grade shows?
This is a question Dr. Rachael Hannah (See Insert) from the University of Alaska at Anchorage has spent much of her career thinking about.  Because grades are the currency for success both in and beyond academia and grade inflation continues to rise, understanding how to make grading and expectations equitable is important to help students navigate the education landscape of the 21st Century. In her seminar talk to the ROSE Network, she introduced the idea -- borrowed from the humanities--  of giving her science students what she calls "Contract Grading". Contract Grading functions like a semester-long rubric, where meeting certain assignments and expectations guarantees the students the corresponding grade on the contact.  According to recent research (some of which is featured in the picture below), Grading Contracts in the sciences have shown promising affects on reducing DFW rates (DFW rates are the percent of students who receive D's, F's, or withdraw from a course -- it's often the metric of instructional success as DFW students cannot progress through their major). This, Dr. Hannah posits, is precisely why its such a useful tool for building an inclusive classroom environment -- it levels the academic playing field for those who may not know the unwritten expectations of doing well in college.
     Aisha O'Connor, Michelle Curtis, and Sarah Shainker were biology graduate students who came out to support the ROSE Network seminar. "I was interested in the topic because I want to teach someday," Michelle Curtis said.  Like many in the audience, Michelle, Aisha and Sarah didn't know about Contract Grading. Aisha reflected, "I didn't get the vibe in undergrad that people cared about how courses were graded. It's quite nice to see, really." As someone who sees teaching in her future, Sarah added, "Contract Grading seems better [than traditional grading] because clear expectations are important for students. Grades can be scary if you try hard but don't know what you will be graded. It really takes the mystery out."  As for Dr. Hannah, she says there is one more benefit for contract grading: for the instructor-- it's less work.

Picture
0 Comments

The one and only Dr. Kimberly Tanner comes to Birmingham!

10/14/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Dr. Kimberly Tanner (left) with Dr. Sami Raut  (right) following Dr. Tanner's talk.
 What is that enthusiasm you can hear down the hall? What's that -- the Biology conference room is packed with so many people that folks were sitting on the floor!  If you peer inside, you can see Dr. Kimberly Tanner, Professor of Biology from San Francisco State University, giving an impressive talk for the UAB Biology Departmental Seminar (co-sponsored by ROSE). Here's what it was about:
--------
 Small-scale change within departments can have large-scale impacts on student success in the science classroom. Dr. Tanner laid out 21 strategies in the classroom that include Think-Pair-Share, asking open-ended questions, and random cold calling, among others. But beyond her own instruction, Dr. Tanner uses a tool her SEPAL lab developed, DART (Decibel Analysis for Research in Teaching) to assess vocal patterns in the classroom. The decibel analysis can show how much class time is being afforded to teachers talking, student discussing, and quite time for student thinking. DART enables professors to have a really quick  and dirty metric for how much of their class time is active and student-centered. Student researcher Joseph Jablonsky noted that, "it was  pretty cool to see how much time some  teachers spend lecturing through quantitative measurements."

In the audience was also Melissa Walker, PhD student and NSF Graduate Research Fellow. "I really liked how Dr. Tanner emphasized how all of these strategies tied back to inclusion." From the 21 teaching strategies to the DART, Dr. Tanner's work allows instructors to produce long-lasting classroom transformations that improve not only content understanding, but also foster a much needed sense of community for students.

With over 50 people in the audience, her message could not have been more well received.

0 Comments

UAB Representation at the CIRTL Forum

10/13/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Dr. Ashley Turner presents her TAR project at the CIRTL Forum.
Both postdoctoral scholar Dr. Ashley Turner and graduate student Sarah Adkins represented UAB at the 6th Annual CIRTL Forum in Philadelphia, PA. Invited by Dr. Kellie Carter and the, UAB Graduate School they showcased their respective Teaching-As-Resarch Projects, a culmination of the three part CIRTL certification program offered through UAB.
In addition, Turner and Adkins were both awarded $500 Travel Awards from the CIRTL form!

0 Comments

How Increasing Equity in the Science Classroom Drives Social Change

9/18/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
How can we make STEM classes more equitable?

Dr. Cissy Ballen, PhD, assistant professor at Auburn University, is a discipline-based education researcher working hard to find answers to this question. Turns out, university education is all too familiar with the student-deficit model, which focuses on shortcomings of students coming into a classroom. Instead, Dr. Ballen's group uses the framework of the course-deficit model, which posits that class conditions favor certain student groups over others. Using the course-deficit model enables Dr. Ballen's team to study performance and participation gaps in order to increase equity across student groups across STEM.

Building off the work of Koester and colleagues (2016), Dr. Ballen's team found that in their student samples across two science colleges, female students only under-performed male students on exams in courses that had high-stakes examinations. But, why is this? Ballen and colleagues further explored mediating variables, such as ACT and text-anxiety, unveiling more gendered differences between outcomes. Importantly, these gender gaps are mitigated when educators minimize the risk associated with high stakes examinations (like exams worth 50% of final course grade being reduced to less than 40% of the final course grade). Ballen's work has also shown that class size can be another factor influencing gender dynamics in the classroom, where female students in larger classes are less likely to voluntarily interact with their professor in class. She implores us to consider the weight of these ideas beyond the university classroom.

Lindsay MacMillan, Biology TA and graduate student, came to Dr. Ballen's talk because she was interested in becoming a better educator. "I liked that [Dr. Ballen] talked about the student versus the course deficit. We need to be thinking about how to change course structure, not the student." Dr. Ballen's outlook asked the audience to consider that classroom experiences are consequential and that they shape perceptions of ability to complete coursework. MacMillan responded, "Equity in the classroom seems increasingly important.  It's under out control as educators in the classroom, even if its not always present in society. So we should help make things right."

Picture
Dr. Cissy Ballen presents her work to the UAB ROSE community.
0 Comments

Insights on High-Structured Courses

3/20/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Do students learn more if they have pre, in-class, and post assessments?  The answer is yes according to the latest work led by Dr. Shaffer, a teaching professor in the Department of Chemical and Biology Engineering  Colorado School of Mines (click here for his faculty website). Dr. Shaffer's educational research highlights the importance of course-structure in large-enrollment Biology and Engineering courses. This follows-- when students interact with course material more and more, they do better in the course. Dr. Shaffer came all the way from Colorado to give a seminar to ROSE about this research. But that's not all his team has found. Specifically, when they investigated the use of optional reading guides, which are designed to supplement textbook readings, they noticed the more often students used reading guides the better they did in the course. (In fact-- this research has led our own Dr. Sami Raut to implement optional reading guides in her courses at UAB!) Dr. Shaffer went on to talk about his recent work that contrasts engineering and biology perceptions about math. Turns out, in his student population, engineering majors were more likely to have negative attitudes about biology but positive attitudes about math and biology majors were more likely to have negative views on math. These insights about course-structure and other student attitudes were a big hit by the 40 or so attendees.

"After teaching many years, improvements are harder to come by from your own mind.  You get tapped out.  Going to [ROSE] meetings gives me new ideas about what works that I can use in my classes to continue to improve. These short [ROSE] meetings are perfect for a busy professor, " said Dr. Robin Foley, UAB Associate professor in Engineering, who attended Dr. Shaffer's talk. In response to Dr. Shaffer's results, Dr. Foley noted, "Got several ideas to try in my class with too many students!"


Picture
Dr. Shaffer presents his work to the UAB ROSE community.
0 Comments

ROSE at Alabama Academy of Science

2/20/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Sarah Adkins presents a poster on ROSE.
Graduate student Sarah Adkins (mentored by Dr. Jeff Morris) presented information about ROSE at the Alabama Academy of Science (held at Tuskegee University), encouraging teachers at Athens State University, Birmingham Southern University, Samford University and other participating schools to tap into our network. UAB undergraduate students also presented their education research, including Rachel Rock (mentored by Sarah Adkins and Dr. Jeff Morris) as well as David Verhine and Gabrielle Richards (mentored by Dr. Sami Raut). All four students received travel awards as well as conference presentation awards. Great job!

More information on the students be found [here].
Picture
David Verhine (left) and Gabrielle Richards (right) present a poster on learning assistant reforms in Introductory Biology.
Picture
Rachel Rock presents a talk on challenges faced by international teaching assistants.
0 Comments

SPACE exploration through parking-lot robotics

2/10/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Colonizing Mars through space exploration is no easy feat.  Tackling contemporary issues to space exploration requires huge multi-disciplinary teams of computer scientists, biologists, engineers, over years and years of research.  Who do you picture doing this work? Are they in grandeous high-tech NASA labs? This week, Dr. Melanie Moses, from the University of New Mexico Department of Computer Science, showed us how she is changing these conceptions by inviting thousands of high school students, most of whom are women and students of color, to participate in "Swarmathon" competitions in large parking lots.  Students program algorithms  for biomimetic robots (initially modeled after ants and other swarming biological creatures), for the robots to efficiently collect resources, modeling Mars exploration in ways that could prove beneficial to NASA. Importantly, Dr. Moses' research has shown over 90% of participants were interested in pursuing degrees in Computer Science. Taken together, this outreach program can not only provide important algorithms for NASA, but can diversify our conceptions of what it means to be a space explorer.

Picture
ROSE members at UAB (shown: Julian Jackson and Dr. Ashley Turner) watch Dr. Moses' talk.
Picture
ROSE members meet at a social a few nights before the talk to play a game about Dr. Moses' research.
0 Comments

AVIDA-ED: Domesticated Computer Viruses for the Biology Classroom

11/2/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Students often struggle to develop an intuitive understanding of the core ideas underlying evolutionary biology. For instance, the concept of "randomness" and how it impacts evolution are not as obvious as we might think. Wouldn't it be cool if there was a way for students to watch evolution happening in real time experiments where they could get a first-hand appreciation for how these things work?

Enter AVIDA, a computer platform where virtual computers -- basically domesticated computer viruses -- compete with each other for access to the computer's processor and memory. AVIDA 'organisms' have 'genomes' -- strings of computer code that let them copy themselves as well as do math operations that get them 'energy'. These genomes mutate randomly during copying, allowing the 'Avidians' to evolve. Importantly, AVIDA isn't a simulation of evolution, but rather a different kind of 'life' that obeys the same laws of selection and drift as the biological world.

AVIDA-ED is a platform developed for using AVIDA in the classroom. It's a simple desktop or browser interface where the user has lots of options for how to set up the 'world' the Avidians will compete in. For our ROSE November Lunch Meeting, Dr. Mickie Powell (UAB Biology) will give us a workshop on how to use AVIDA-ED in an introductory biology classroom. Prior to attending the meeting, please download and read the two files below. Also, go ahead and take a look at the web-based version of AVIDA-ED.

why_we_get_sick-antibiotic_resistance.pdf
File Size: 4308 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

avida_ed_exercise-rose.docx
File Size: 135 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

0 Comments

Thinking How to Think

10/3/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Dr. Rosianna Gray, PhD, from the University of Alabama at Birmimgham led a thoughtful in person and virtual live conversation called "Get Students to Focus on Learning Instead of Grades:  Metacognition is the Key" with ROSE members Wednesday, October, 3 2018. Dr. Gray discussed how she helps her introductory students think about their own learning behaviors instead of focusing on just getting good grades. Her insight included telling students to understand material covered in class as though they were needing to teach it and not just taking a test. She also recommends students gradually go through the material in small chunks using variant approaches while self assessing over a longer period of time instead of becoming intimated by large spreads of content. In this way, students can meaningfully engage with the fascinating topics covered in STEM courses and become as passionate as they are smart. In her words "All students are smart. Some just need to adjust their learning behaviors to reach their full potential in class."


Materials from Dr. Gray's Metacognition workshop can be found below:


metacognition_talk_for_rose_network_2018.pptx
File Size: 23214 kb
File Type: pptx
Download File

metacognition_strategies_to_try_immediately_2018.pdf
File Size: 367 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

grandmas_recipe_handout.pdf
File Size: 422 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

vark_handout.pdf
File Size: 104 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    January 2021
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • ROSE
  • SEMINAR SERIES
    • SEMINAR BLOG
  • ROSE Fellowship Program
    • Resources >
      • Assesments/Surveys
      • Curriculum/Modules
      • PAPERS
  • Contact
    • PEOPLE